Allen, S. C., Charlton, C., Backen, W., Warwick-Sanders, M. and Yeung, P., 2010. Performing slow vital capacity in older people with and without cognitive impairment – is it useful? Age and Ageing, 39 (5), pp. 588-591.
Full text not available from this repository.
Background: most patients with moderate cognitive impairment are unable to perform forced spirometry. It has been suggested that slow vital capacity (SVC) is easier to perform than forced vital capacity (FVC) because it requires less understanding and co-ordination. We conducted a study to determine whether that assertion is correct. Methods: we studied 83 inpatients, mean age 83 years (range 67–95, 51 female). They had measurements made of FVC, SVC and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The spirometry was conducted using the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society standards. Results: of the 83 subjects, 38 were able to do both FVC and SVC and 32 were unable to do either. The overall concordance was 84%. Twelve were able to do SVC but not FVC (eight due to excessive cough, two due to weakness and two had an MMSE < 24 with poor co-ordination). An inability to do neither FVC nor SVC was predicted by an MMSE < 24/30 (P < 0.0001) with a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 67%. Conclusion: SVC is not a usable substitute for FVC for elderly patients with cognitive impairment but is of some utility for those who tend to cough. An MMSE < 24/30 is predictive of inability to perform FVC and SVC.
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||* forced vital capacity * slow vital capacity * spirometry * elderly * cognitive impairment|
|Subjects:||Technology > Medicine and Health > Medicine and Surgery|
|Group:||School of Health and Social Care > Centre for Postgraduate Medical Research and Education|
|Deposited By:||Prof Stephen Allen|
|Deposited On:||04 Jun 2010 16:27|
|Last Modified:||07 Mar 2013 15:31|
|Repository Staff Only -|
|BU Staff Only -|
|Help Guide -||Editing Your Items in BURO|