Tools
ToolsWee, M.Y., Tuckey, J. P., Thomas, P. and Burnard, S., 2014. A comparison of intramuscular diamorphine and intramuscular pethidine for labour analgesia: a two-centre randomised blinded controlled trial. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 121 (4), 447 - 456 .
Full text available as:
|
PDF
Wee_et_al-2014-BJOG__An_International_Journal_of_Obstetrics_&_Gynaecology.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. 365kB | |
|
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Abstract
Intramuscular (i.m.) pethidine is used worldwide for labour analgesia and i.m. diamorphine usage has increased in the UK in the last 15 years. This trial aims to ascertain the relative efficacy and adverse effects of diamorphine and pethidine for labour pain.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1470-0328 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Diamorphine ; labour analgesia ; meperidine ; opiate ; pethidine ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Analgesia, Obstetrical ; Analgesics, Opioid ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Heroin ; Humans ; Injections, Intramuscular ; Labor Pain ; Logistic Models ; Meperidine ; Pain Measurement ; Pregnancy ; Prospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult |
| Group: | Faculty of Health & Social Sciences |
| ID Code: | 22219 |
| Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
| Deposited On: | 13 Jul 2015 11:10 |
| Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 13:52 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
| Repository Staff Only - |