Biggins, D., Crowley, E. J., Bolat, E., Dupac, M. and Dogan, H., 2015. Using Peerwise to improve engagement and learning. In: The European Conference on Education, 1--5 July 2015, Brighton, UK, 585 - 602 .
Full text available as:
|
PDF
Biggins et al_2015_Using Peerwise to Improve Engagement and Learning.pdf - Accepted Version 413kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Official URL: http://iafor.org/archives/proceedings/ECE/ECE2015_...
Abstract
This paper assesses the experiences of Bournemouth University in using the online multiple choice question (MCQ) tool, Peerwise, in student learning and engagement. MCQs are excellent for developing and testing knowledge, providing reassurance and identifying development needs. The creation of MCQs reinforces learning by tasking students to generate challenging questions. Peerwise supports self-direction and flexibility, which is embraced by students. Bournemouth University started embedding Peerwise within teaching units in 2014. The intention was to transform the approach of students towards the non-assessed elements of the unit. Peerwise was used in an undergraduate business unit consisting of 50 students over at 15 week period. 804 questions were created and 3,345 answers were recorded. 10% of the unit marks were allocated to Peerwise use. Qualitative feedback from students was very positive. Correlation analysis showed a very weak relationship, 0.120, between the number of questions answered and the overall unit mark. Self-assessment of the change in learning was statistically significantly better for students who used Peerwise compared to those who did not. Overall, the evaluation of the Peerwise was positive with many lessons learnt. Six recommendations for the further use of Peerwise were developed, including improving the scaffolding to students, refining the way quality is assessed and developing evaluation criteria.
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Paper) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2188-1162 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Peerwise, MCQ, student engagement, gamification, technology-enhanced learning |
Group: | Professional Services |
ID Code: | 22850 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 10 Nov 2015 09:27 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 13:54 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |