Evis, L.H., Hanson, I. and Cheetham, P., 2016. An experimental study of two grave excavation methods: Arbitrary Level Excavation and Stratigraphic Excavation. Science & Technology of Archaeological Research, 2 (2), 177 - 191.
Full text available as:
|
PDF (OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE)
An experimental study of two grave excavation methods Arbitrary Level Excavation and Stratigraphic Excavation.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 1MB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Official URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/205489...
DOI: 10.1080/20548923.2016.1229916
Abstract
The process of archaeological excavation is one of destruction. It normally provides archaeologists with a singular opportunity to recognise, define, extract and record archaeological evidence: the artefacts, features and deposits present in the archaeological record. It is expected that when archaeologists are excavating in a research, commercial or forensic setting the methods that they utilise will ensure a high rate of evidence recognition and recovery. Methods need to be accepted amongst the archaeological and scientific community they are serving and be deemed reliable. For example, in forensic contexts, methods need to conform to scientific and legal criteria so that the evidence retrieved is admissible in a court of law. Two standard methods of grave excavation were examined in this study with the aim of identifying the better approach in terms of evidence recovery. Four archaeologists with a range of experience each excavated two similarly constructed experimental ‘single graves’ using two different excavation methods. Those tested were the arbitrary level excavation method and the stratigraphic excavation method. The results from the excavations were used to compare recovery rates for varying forms of evidence placed within the graves. The stratigraphic excavation method resulted in higher rates of recovery for all evidence types, with an average of 71% of evidence being recovered, whereas the arbitrary level excavation method recovered an average of 56%. Neither method recovered all of the evidence. These findings raise questions about the reliability and so suitability of these established approaches to excavation.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2054-8923 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Archaeological Excavation ; Arbitrary Excavation ; Stratigraphic Excavation ; Forensic Evidence ; Forensic ; Forensic Archaeology |
Group: | Faculty of Science & Technology |
ID Code: | 29749 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 25 Sep 2017 13:13 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 14:07 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |