Branney, J. and Priego-Hernández, J., 2018. A mixed methods evaluation of team-based learning for applied pathophysiology in undergraduate nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 61 (February), 127 - 133.
Full text available as:
|
PDF (OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE)
1-s2.0-S026069171730268X-main.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. 406kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.014
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is important for nurses to have a thorough understanding of the biosciences such as pathophysiology that underpin nursing care. These courses include content that can be difficult to learn. Team-based learning is emerging as a strategy for enhancing learning in nurse education due to the promotion of individual learning as well as learning in teams. OBJECTIVES: In this study we sought to evaluate the use of team-based learning in the teaching of applied pathophysiology to undergraduate student nurses. DESIGN: A mixed methods observational study. METHODS: In a year two, undergraduate nursing applied pathophysiology module circulatory shock was taught using Team-based Learning while all remaining topics were taught using traditional lectures. After the Team-based Learning intervention the students were invited to complete the Team-based Learning Student Assessment Instrument, which measures accountability, preference and satisfaction with Team-based Learning. Students were also invited to focus group discussions to gain a more thorough understanding of their experience with Team-based Learning. Exam scores for answers to questions based on Team-based Learning-taught material were compared with those from lecture-taught material. RESULTS: Of the 197 students enrolled on the module, 167 (85% response rate) returned the instrument, the results from which indicated a favourable experience with Team-based Learning. Most students reported higher accountability (93%) and satisfaction (92%) with Team-based Learning. Lectures that promoted active learning were viewed as an important feature of the university experience which may explain the 76% exhibiting a preference for Team-based Learning. Most students wanted to make a meaningful contribution so as not to let down their team and they saw a clear relevance between the Team-based Learning activities and their own experiences of teamwork in clinical practice. Exam scores on the question related to Team-based Learning-taught material were comparable to those related to lecture-taught material. CONCLUSIONS: Most students had a preference for, and reported higher accountability and satisfaction with Team-based Learning. Through contextualisation and teamwork, Team-based Learning appears to be a strategy that confers strong pedagogical benefits for teaching applied pathophysiology (bioscience) to student nurses.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0260-6917 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Applied pathophysiology ; Biosciences in nurse education ; Evidence-informed decision making ; TBL ; Team-based learning |
Group: | Faculty of Health & Social Sciences |
ID Code: | 30109 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 11 Dec 2017 16:52 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 14:08 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |