Asmuß, B. and Oshima, S., 2018. Strategy making as a communicative practice: the multimodal accomplishment of strategy roles. Management, 21 (2), 884-912.
Full text available as:
PDF
Asmuß_Oshima-management.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. 618kB | ||
|
PDF
en_1532718180.pdf - Published Version 470kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Abstract
This paper deals with the communicative accomplishment of strategy practices and processes (Cooren et al., 2015; Pälli, 2017; Vásquez et al., 2017). We do so by investigating one significant activity within an organizational strategy making process, namely strategy meetings. Here, members of the upper management group create concrete drafts for the actual strategy document, and we focus on a specific action sequence where strategy actors propose changes to the strategy document. Specifically, we investigate how the participants subsequently deal with the proposal, how such interaction work facilitates the accomplishment of strategy roles, and how the interaction impacts the decision making process. Our study shows that strategy actors, when making these decisions, not only orient to an acceptance or rejection of the proposal but also to questions of entitlement (Asmuß & Oshima, 2012). This orientation involves multimodal resources, ranging from talk (Samra-Fredericks, 2003) to embodied and material resources. The study thus provides an empirical demonstration of the processual aspects of strategy work and their impact on strategic outcomes; further, it highlights the importance for practice studies to acknowledge communicative (verbal, embodied and material) aspects in capturing the complexity of strategy work.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1286-4692 |
Additional Information: | This article is embargoed until it is officially published on the journal's website: http://www.management-aims.com/ |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | CCO; Strategy as Practice; strategy making; multimodality; conversation analysis; |
Group: | Faculty of Media & Communication |
ID Code: | 30764 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 30 May 2018 10:45 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 14:11 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |