Skip to main content

The redundancy of positivism as a paradigm for nursing research.

Corry, M., Porter, S. and McKenna, H., 2019. The redundancy of positivism as a paradigm for nursing research. Nursing Philosophy, 20 (1), e12230.

Full text available as:

GreenVersion.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.


DOI: 10.1111/nup.12230


New nursing researchers are faced with a smorgasbord of competing methodologies. Sometimes, they are encouraged to adopt the research paradigms beloved of their senior colleagues. This is a problem if those paradigms are no longer of contemporary methodological relevance. The aim of this paper was to provide clarity about current research paradigms. It seeks to interrogate the continuing viability of positivism as a guiding paradigm for nursing research. It does this by critically analysing the methodological literature. Five major paradigms are addressed: the positivist; the interpretivist/constructivist; the transformative; the realist; and the postpositivist. Acceptance of interpretivist, transformative or realist approaches necessarily entails wholesale rejection of positivism, while acceptance of postpositivism involves its partial rejection. Postpositivism has superseded positivism as the guiding paradigm of the scientific method. The incorporation in randomized controlled trials of postpositivist assumptions indicates that even on the methodological territory that it once claimed as its own, positivism has been rendered redundant as an appropriate paradigm for contemporary nursing research.

Item Type:Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:constructivism ; interpretivism ; positivism ; postpositivism ; realism ; research methodology
Group:Faculty of Health & Social Sciences
ID Code:31622
Deposited By: Symplectic RT2
Deposited On:09 Jan 2019 14:16
Last Modified:14 Mar 2022 14:14


Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...
Repository Staff Only -