Aranda-Valera, I. C., Cuesta-Vargas, A., Garrido-Castro, J. L., Gardiner, P. V., Lopez-Medina, C., Machado, P. M., Condell, J., Connolly, J., Williams, J. M., Munoz-Esquivel, K., O'Dwyer, T., Castro-Villegas, M. C., Gonzalez-Navas, C. and Collantes-Estevez, E., 2020. Measuring Spinal Mobility Using an Inertial Measurement Unit System: A Validation Study in Axial Spondyloarthritis. Diagnostics, 10 (6), 426.
Full text available as:
|
PDF (OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL)
Diag IMU for Spinal mobility in AxSp2020.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 753kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10060426
Abstract
Portable inertial measurement units (IMUs) are beginning to be used in human motion analysis. These devices can be useful for the evaluation of spinal mobility in individuals with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The objectives of this study were to assess (a) concurrent criterion validity in individuals with axSpA by comparing spinal mobility measured by an IMU sensor-based system vs. optical motion capture as the reference standard; (b) discriminant validity comparing mobility with healthy volunteers; (c) construct validity by comparing mobility results with relevant outcome measures. A total of 70 participants with axSpA and 20 healthy controls were included. Individuals with axSpA completed function and activity questionnaires, and their mobility was measured using conventional metrology for axSpA, an optical motion capture system, and an IMU sensor-based system. The UCOASMI, a metrology index based on measures obtained by motion capture, and the IUCOASMI, the same index using IMU measures, were also calculated. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted to show the relationships between outcome measures. There was excellent agreement (ICC > 0.90) between both systems and a significant correlation between the IUCOASMI and conventional metrology (r = 0.91), activity (r = 0.40), function (r = 0.62), quality of life (r = 0.55) and structural change (r = 0.76). This study demonstrates the validity of an IMU system to evaluate spinal mobility in axSpA. These systems are more feasible than optical motion capture systems, and they could be useful in clinical practice.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2075-4418 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | axial spondyloarthritis; spinal mobility; inertial measurement unit |
Group: | Faculty of Health & Social Sciences |
ID Code: | 34236 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 03 Jul 2020 11:12 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 14:22 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |