Escriche-Escuder, A., De-Torres, I., Roldán-Jiménez, C., Martín-Martín, J., Muro-Culebras, A., González-Sánchez, M., Ruiz-Muñoz, M., Mayoral-Cleries, F., Biró, A., Tang, W., Nikolova, B., Salvatore, A. and Cuesta-Vargas, A.I., 2020. Assessment of the quality of mobile applications (Apps) for management of low back pain using the mobile app rating scale (mars). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (24), -.
Full text available as:
|
PDF (OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE)
ijerph-17-09209-v2.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 372kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Abstract
Digital health interventions may improve different behaviours. However, the rapid proliferation of technological solutions often does not allow for a correct assessment of the quality of the tools. This study aims to review and assess the quality of the available mobile applications (apps) related to interventions for low back pain. Two reviewers search the official stores of Android (Play Store) and iOS (App Store) for localisation in Spain and the United Kingdom, in September 2019, searching for apps related to interventions for low back pain. Seventeen apps finally are included. The quality of the apps is measured using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). The scores of each section and the final score of the apps are retrieved and the mean and standard deviation obtained. The average quality ranges between 2.83 and 4.57 (mean 3.82) on a scale from 1 (inadequate) to 5 (excellent). The best scores are found in functionality (4.7), followed by aesthetic content (mean 4.1). Information (2.93) and engagement (3.58) are the worst rated items. Apps generally have good overall quality, especially in terms of functionality and aesthetics. Engagement and information should be improved in most of the apps. Moreover, scientific evidence is necessary to support the use of applied health tools.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1661-7827 |
Additional Information: | This article belongs to the Special Issue Digital Health for Exercise Prescription in Health and Disease |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | application (app); exercise; mHealth; Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS); low back pain |
Group: | Faculty of Science & Technology |
ID Code: | 35015 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 05 Jan 2021 08:08 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 14:25 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |