Wiggins, D., Hundley, V. A., Bond, C., Wilkins, C. and Walton, G., 2023. Could a decision support tool be the key to supporting choice for women regarding place of birth? Midwifery, 117, 103564.
Full text available as:
|
PDF
Journal Article main document_Midwifery_revised v3.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. 264kB | |
|
PDF
Figure 1.Recruitment flowchart.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. 110kB | |
|
PDF
Tables revised V2.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. 252kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103564
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of using an innovative decision aid, MyBirthplace, to facilitate shared decision-making regarding place of birth. DESIGN: A quasi-experimental study comparing pre-test and post-test responses from participants who had access to the intervention. SETTING: A large urban hospital in the south of England. PARTICIPANTS: All pregnant women who accessed maternity care between April and December 2016. INTERVENTION: A decision aid (MyBirthplace) designed to provide information and support regarding place of birth. The digital tool (available in both an app and web-based version) was used to facilitate discuss between the women and her midwife at the booking visit. MEASUREMENTS: Women's stage of decision making as measured by the Stage of Decision Making Scale. A questionnaire was administered before and after using MyBirthplace at booking, and again at 28 weeks gestation. FINDINGS: Nearly half the women (42.1%) had already decided where they wanted to give birth before the booking appointment, but a third (34.3%) had not yet begun to think about their choices. The introduction of the decision aid during the booking visit was associated with a significant increase in the stage of decision making suggesting that women had greater certainty in their decision P< 0.0001 [SD 1.077]. Women who accessed MyBirthplace had lower decisional conflict after the booking appointment than those women that did not access the decision aid (35.5% compared with 22.0%) but this difference was not statistically significant. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Decision aids, as a standard part of practice, have the potential to ensure women are informed of their options and encourage shared decision making about place of birth. Women were more confident with their decision following the booking appointment and by 28 weeks; however, further research is needed to identify the role that the decision aid played in building this confidence. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The introduction of a decision aid, Mybirthplace, within the hospital impacted early discussions between the woman and the midwife and appeared to benefit women's decision making regarding place of birth. Further studies of midwives' use of innovative technologies and their implementation are required.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0266-6138 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Birth place; Choice; Decision aid; Decisional conflict; MyBirthplace |
Group: | Faculty of Health & Social Sciences |
ID Code: | 37937 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 20 Dec 2022 11:13 |
Last Modified: | 06 Dec 2023 01:08 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |