Skip to main content

Accounting for complexity in critical realist trials: the promise of PLS-SEM.

Singleton, H., Porter, S., Beavis, J., Falconer, E., Priego Hernandez, J. and Holley, D., 2023. Accounting for complexity in critical realist trials: the promise of PLS-SEM. Journal of Critical Realism. (In Press)

Full text available as:

[img] PDF
Methods paper May 2023.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.



Background : Randomized controlled trials have been criticized for their inability to identify and differentiate the causal mechanisms that generate the outcomes they measure. One posited solution is the development of realist trials that combine the empirical precision of trials’ outcome data with realism’s theoretical capacity to identify the powers that generate outcomes. Main Body : We review realist arguments for and against this position and conclude that critical realist trials are viable. Using the example of an evaluation of the educational effectiveness of virtual reality simulation, we explore whether Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling can move statistical analysis beyond correlational analysis to support realist identification of the mechanisms that generate correlations. Conclusion: We tentatively conclude that PLS-SEM, with its ability to identify ‘points of action’, has the potential to provide direction for researchers and practitioners in terms of how, for whom, when, where and in what circumstances an intervention has worked.

Item Type:Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:RCT; Critical realist evaluation; Critical Realism; Causality; PLS-SEM
Group:Faculty of Health & Social Sciences
ID Code:38566
Deposited By: Symplectic RT2
Deposited On:24 May 2023 14:55
Last Modified:24 May 2023 14:55


Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...
Repository Staff Only -