Datye, S., Smiljanic, M., Shetti, R. H., MacRae-Miller, A., van Teijlingen, E., Vinayakarao, L., Peters, E. M., Lebel, C. A., Tomfohr-Madsen, L., Giesbrecht, G., Khashu, M. and Conrad, M. L., 2024. Prenatal maternal mental health and resilience in the United Kingdom during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A cross- national comparison. Frontiers in Psychiatry. (In Press)
Full text available as:
PDF
1411761_Manuscript Frontiers Psychiatry Aug 2024.PDF - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 705kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Abstract
1. Introduction: High levels of prenatal mental health problems are associated with morbidity for the pregnant person, and their infants are at long-term risk for poor health outcomes. We aim to explore how the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic affected the mental health of pregnant people in the United Kingdom (UK) in comparison with other countries, and to further identify UK specific influences which may have contributed to varying mental health outcomes. We also aim to examine the quality of antenatal care provided during the pandemic and to identify potential inadequacies to enhance preparedness for future events. Methods: During June-November 2020, we recruited 3666 individuals in the UK for the EPPOCH pregnancy cohort (Maternal mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Effect of the Pandemic on Pregnancy Outcomes and Childhood Health). Participants were assessed for depression, anxiety, anger and pregnancy-related anxiety using validated scales. Additionally, physical activity, social support, individualized support and personal resilience of the respondents were assessed as potential protective factors. Results: Participants reported high levels of depression (57.05%), anxiety (58.04%) and anger (58.05%). Higher levels of support and personal resilience were associated with lower mental health challenges. In the UK, depression was significantly increased during the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic data. Additionally, pregnant individuals in the UK experienced higher depression than that reported in five other nations. Finally, qualitative analysis revealed that restrictions for partners and support persons during medical appointments as well as poor public health communication led to increased mental health adversities and hindered ability to make medical decisions. Discussion: This study revealed alarmingly increased mental health challenges among pregnant individuals in the UK during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in comparison with other developed countries. These results highlight the need for reassessing the mental health support measures available to pregnant people in the UK, both during times of crisis and in general.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1664-0640 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Pregnancy; Maternal Mental Health; Depression; Anxiety; resilience; support; mixed methods |
Group: | Faculty of Health & Social Sciences |
ID Code: | 40301 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 09 Sep 2024 12:51 |
Last Modified: | 09 Sep 2024 12:51 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |