Haubrock, P. J., Parker, B., Błońska, D., Briski, E., Everts, T, Fernandez, R. D., Kouba, A., Kourantidou, M., Kurtul, I., Mammola, S., Musolin, D. L., Nuñez, M. A., Olden, J. D., Rasmussen, J. J., Renault, D., Russell, J. C., Sousa, R., Tarkan, A. S. and Britton, J. R., 2025. Conceptual and ethical considerations in invasion science. Bioscience, 75 (4), 317-330.
Full text available as:
![]() |
PDF
Haubrock et al ethics_R2_clean.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only until 22 January 2026. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. 370kB |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Abstract
Invasion science addresses interconnected ecological, economic, and social challenges posed by the introduction of nonnative species. Therefore, invasion scientists have to consider and reconcile interdisciplinary needs while addressing the potential implications of their findings. Navigating diverse disciplines, including environmental sciences, ecology, economics, and the humanities, invasion scientists seek to arrive at informed decisions on invasion risk, impact, and management. Individual biases, uncertainties, and systemic pressures influence the ability to maintain objectivity and resist pressures that might otherwise distort their findings or applications. In the present commentary, we examine conceptual and ethical dilemmas within the field of invasion science, particularly reputational and the risks of the discipline perpetuating its own relevance by framing invasions as insurmountable challenges. In the discussion, we highlight how incentive structures, biased assessments and framing, and conflicts of interest may compromise the discipline’s integrity. We also explore questions surrounding human responsibility to animal welfare and highlight ethical conundrums in the management of invasive species.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0006-3568 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | human responsibility; sustainability science; environmental ethics; ethical dilemmas; philosophical challenges |
Group: | Faculty of Science & Technology |
ID Code: | 41142 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 02 Jul 2025 11:45 |
Last Modified: | 02 Jul 2025 11:45 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |