Jonkman, H. H. R., Van Tol, F. R., Govers, T. M., Debets, S. A. C. A., Wainwright, T. W., Debono, B., Yang, M. M. H., de Boer, H. D., Rovers, M. M. and Verlaan, J. -J., 2026. Enhanced recovery after lumbar fusion surgery: an international survey on current practice. Global Spine Journal. (In Press)
Full text available as:
Preview |
PDF (OPEN ACCESS)
jonkman-et-al-2026-enhanced-recovery-after-lumbar-fusion-surgery-an-international-survey-on-current-practice.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. 1MB |
|
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1177/21925682261434216
Abstract
Study Design Cross-sectional, web-based international survey study. Objectives To assess spine surgeons’ perspectives on the importance of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) components and barriers to implementing ERAS programs in degenerative lumbar fusion. Methods In May 2024, a web-based survey was distributed to AOSpine members. The survey covered eight ERAS components derived from the 2021 consensus statement for perioperative care in lumbar fusion. Respondents selected up to three components with the biggest perceived impact on recovery and up to three with the greatest room for improvement. Responses were summarized in a priority matrix. Demographics, perceived barriers, and implementation support needs were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results The survey was accessed by 400 individuals, yielding 322 responses (80.5%) and a 76.7% completion rate. Respondents represented academic (50.6%), private (28.9%), and local/community hospitals (20.5%) worldwide. ERAS components perceived to have the biggest impact on recovery were multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia (73.3%), early mobilization (63.8%), and preoperative education & counselling (58.6%), which were also identified as having the greatest room for improvement (39.4%, 41.4%, and 62.6%, respectively). Key barriers were the absence of clear protocols and guidelines (56.2%), staff shortages (53.8%), and difficulties coordinating implementation and adherence (43.0%). Conclusion Multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, early mobilization, and preoperative education & counselling were identified as ERAS components with the biggest perceived impact on patient recovery and the greatest room for improvement. Targeted efforts in these domains may represent an important opportunity to enhance perioperative care and support the implementation of ERAS programs in lumbar spinal fusion.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2192-5682 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | lumbar fusion; degenerative; early recovery; ERAS; survey; questionnaire; AOSpine; ERAS-DLF |
| Group: | Faculty of Health, Environment & Medical Sciences |
| ID Code: | 41876 |
| Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
| Deposited On: | 25 Mar 2026 15:21 |
| Last Modified: | 25 Mar 2026 15:21 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
| Repository Staff Only - |
Tools
Tools