Vaidya, A., Simkhada, P., van Teijlingen, E. and Lee, A. C. K., 2026. Understanding the formulation of non-communicable disease policies in Nepal: A qualitative study. Health Policy and Planning. (In Press)
Full text available as:
Preview |
PDF
Anju HPP accepted manuscript April 2026.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. 700kB |
|
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Official URL: https://academic.oup.com/heapol/advance-article/do...
Abstract
Few policies have focused specifically on the growing burden of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCD) in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC). Health policy formulation plays a vital role in the allocation of resources to implement effective interventions and reforms; hence, a nuanced understanding of the health policy formulation process is essential. However, there is limited evidence about the process through which NCD policies were formulated in Nepal. This study used Kingdon’s multiple streams framework to explore how NCDs were recognized and prioritized, how policy alternatives were decided, how policy windows were opened, and which contextual factors influenced the policy formulation process. A qualitative case study approach was applied to gain a comprehensive understanding of the formulation of major NCD-related policies in Nepal. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 key stakeholders, and policy documents were analyzed using framework analysis. The NCDs were gradually recognized and prioritized through the convergence of global and local evidence, sustained advocacy, and international commitments. Policymakers encountered several challenges, such as competing health priorities, the chronic nature of NCDs, donor preferences for communicable diseases, financial constraints, and multisectoral complexities of NCDs. The Package of Essential Non-communicable diseases (PEN) interventions were adopted as a policy alternative, informed by global evidence, World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations, and lessons from other countries. While coordinated efforts by stakeholders brought the problem, policy and politics streams together, the role of policy entrepreneurs was found to be less relevant in Nepal’s context. The findings highlight the need to consider external influences while conducting similar studies in LMICs. Further research is needed on strategies to address persistent structural and financial challenges in NCD policy formulation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1460-2237 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Nepal; Non communicable disease; policy; south Asia; policy analysis |
| Group: | Faculty of Health, Environment & Medical Sciences |
| ID Code: | 41920 |
| Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
| Deposited On: | 10 Apr 2026 14:18 |
| Last Modified: | 10 Apr 2026 14:18 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
| Repository Staff Only - |
Tools
Tools