Skip to main content

Skin tone and diagnostic equity in contactless blood pressure screening: A prospective observational field evaluation of remote photoplethysmography in Nigeria.

Dasa, D. and Davies, P., 2026. Skin tone and diagnostic equity in contactless blood pressure screening: A prospective observational field evaluation of remote photoplethysmography in Nigeria. BMJ Open, 16 (6), e119311.

Full text available as:

[thumbnail of 01_Manuscript_Clean.pdf] PDF
01_Manuscript_Clean.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

814kB
[thumbnail of 03_Supplementary_Material.pdf] PDF
03_Supplementary_Material.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

803kB
[thumbnail of 04_STARD_Checklist.pdf] PDF
04_STARD_Checklist.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only

406kB
[thumbnail of e119311.full.pdf]
Preview
PDF
e119311.full.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

944kB

DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119311

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate diagnostic equity, feasibility, and acceptability of a remote photoplethysmography based blood pressure screening application among adults with darker skin tones in Nigeria. Design Prospective observational multi-site field evaluation. Setting Three hospitals in Kebbi State, Nigeria. Participants Adults with Fitzpatrick skin types V to VI. Outcome measures Feasibility, agreement, diagnostic accuracy, acceptability, and equity relevant factors including facial tribal markings and internet bandwidth, using automated cuff measurements as the reference standard and a 140 over 90 mm Hg hypertension threshold. Results Among 306 enrolled participants, 249 (81.4%) produced usable readings. Agreement was poor (systolic MAE 15.4 mm Hg, RMSE 19.9; diastolic MAE 10.9 mm Hg, RMSE 13.6). Sensitivity for threshold-based SBP and DBP classification was verylow (systolic 0.04; diastolic 0.10), with systolic sensitivity 0.00 in Fitzpatrick type VI. Specificity was high (systolic 0.99; diastolic 0.89). Lower internet bandwidth correlated with reading failure (r = −0.69 to −0.51). While 70% of patients and over 90% of staff rated the tool favourably, technical limitations created a clear perception–performance gap. In an exploratory interaction analysis, Fitzpatrick type VI was associated with higher odds of measurement failure (OR 5.08, 95% CI 2.41–10.72), but there was no clear evidence that facial tribal markings modified this association (interaction OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.16–2.73; p=0.564). Conclusions rPPG-based blood pressure screening was feasible but showed inadequate performance in this darker-skinned field cohort, with critically low sensitivity. Without algorithmic recalibration for skin tone diversity and improved offline functionality, cloud-dependent rPPG systems deployed without spectrum-balanced validation may risk exacerbating diagnostic inequities in similar settings.

Item Type:Article
ISSN:2044-6055
Uncontrolled Keywords:Remote photoplethysmography; Hypertension; Skin Pigmentation; Health Screening
Group:Faculty of Media, Science and Technology
ID Code:42099
Deposited By: Symplectic RT2
Deposited On:08 Jul 2026 15:22
Last Modified:08 Jul 2026 15:22

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...
Repository Staff Only -