Marzano, L., Brown, S., Spence, R., Joyner, L., Norman, H., Fields, B., Barbin, A., Kruger, I. and MacDonald Hart, S., 2025. Environmental risk factors for railway suicide: A nationwide analysis of England’s mainline network (2019–2021). Archives of Suicide Research, 30 (3), 808-826.
Full text available as:
Preview |
PDF
Environmental Risk Factors for Railway Suicide A Nationwide Analysis of England s Mainline Network 2019 2021 .pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 1MB |
|
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2025.2595428
Abstract
Objective: Suicide is the leading cause of death on the railway networks, yet little is known about the geography and socio-environmental determinants of such deaths in England. Method: We analyzed official records of all suspected suicides recorded on England’s mainline railway from April 2019 to March 2021 (N = 436), alongside area-level data (e.g., deprivation and urbanicity) and railway characteristics (e.g., station size). We used SaTScan’s Poisson discrete scan statistic to detect spatial–temporal clusters and compared suicides at station and non-station locations, including stations with no recorded suicides over the study period. Results: Most railway suicides—particularly those occurring at stations—took place in urban areas, typically at locations with a very low incidence of previous suicides. A large majority (84.5%) lived within 2 miles of a station and died close to home (median 2.1 miles) or their last known location (1.5 miles). Suicides occurred most often at stations (43.3%), followed by trackside locations (37.6%), foot/level crossing (15.1%) or other rail areas (3.9%). These were often not the nearest station to the deceased (59.6%), but were generally smaller and more likely to be served by fast/non-stopping trains. Across the network, stations without suicides were far less likely to be served by such trains (66% vs. 94.3%; OR = 6.62, 95% CI 3.33–13.18). Conclusions: Urbanicity and the availability of non-stopping train services are key predictors of railway suicide. Restricting access to high-speed trains—especially at smaller urban stations and at non-station locations—could be an effective element of broader strategies and local partnership approaches to prevent suicide.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1381-1118 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Cluster; environment; geography; location; railway; suicide |
| Group: | Faculty of Media, Science and Technology |
| ID Code: | 42313 |
| Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
| Deposited On: | 13 Aug 2026 17:57 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Aug 2026 17:57 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
| Repository Staff Only - |
Tools
Tools