Daodu, L., Raste, Y., Allgrove, J. E., Arrigoni, F. and Kayyali, R., 2026. Exploring long covid care pathways in the UK NHS: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals’ experiences. BMJ Open, 16 (9), 120704.
Full text available as:
Preview |
PDF (OPEN ACCESS)
Daodu et al (2026d).pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 1MB |
|
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-120704
Abstract
Objectives To explore the operational reality of the long covid care pathway from the perspective of National Health Service (NHS) professionals, addressing the gap between national guidelines and frontline implementation. Design A qualitative study using single-timepoint, semistructured interviews. Data were collected between July and October 2024. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Setting Primary and secondary NHS care settings in a diverse South London Borough (Croydon), UK. Participants 12 NHS healthcare professionals managing adult patients, comprising general practitioners (GPs, n=5), respiratory consultants (n=2), specialist nurses (n=3), a respiratory physiotherapist (n=1) and a clinical psychologist (n=1). Results The operational reality of long covid care was constructed around four central themes. First, lacking definitive biomarkers, clinicians navigated diagnostic uncertainty using pragmatic, exclusionary testing and subjective severity assessments. Second, GPs acted as administrative linchpins, compelled to triage patients into fragmented, symptom-driven specialist silos. Third, treatment demonstrated therapeutic pragmatism, relying heavily on non-pharmacological rehabilitation rather than medicalised cures. Finally, variable monitoring practices across secondary services created a post-discharge ‘continuity gap’, placing the burden of re-initiating care on the patient. These systemic frictions were synthesised into an eight-step operational care pathway map. Conclusions While national guidelines provide best practices, this study uniquely captures the systemic bottlenecks that occur when operationalising these standards locally. The mapped pathway reveals a pressing need for the standardisation of functional assessment tools, genuinely integrated interdisciplinary clinics and robust post-discharge tracking to mitigate the burden of coordination on primary care.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2044-6055 |
| Group: | Faculty of Health, Environment & Medical Sciences |
| ID Code: | 42406 |
| Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
| Deposited On: | 23 Sep 2026 10:26 |
| Last Modified: | 23 Sep 2026 10:26 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
| Repository Staff Only - |
Tools
Tools