Felton, M., Grigsby, S. and Hundley, V., 2026. Acute cardiovascular responses to slow and deep breathing in normotensive non-pregnant and pregnant women. Frontiers in Network Physiology, 6, 1913383.
Full text available as:
Preview |
PDF
Felton et al (2026) SDB Acute pregnancy vs. non pregnant.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 2MB |
|
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.3389/fnetp.2026.1913383
Abstract
Objective: To compare the acute cardiovascular responses of non-pregnant and pregnant women to slow and deep breathing (SDB) at a range of breathing frequencies. Participants: Forty-one women (23 non-pregnant and 18 pregnant).Methods: Participants completed five different breathing conditions in a randomised order (5-min duration); spontaneous breathing (Sfr), dynamic SDB breathing frequency (Dfr), and three fixed breathing frequencies of 4 breaths. min−1 (4Ffr), 6 breaths. min−1 (6Ffr), and 8 breaths. min−1 (8Ffr). Main Outcome Measures: Non-invasive beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure, heart rate and respired airflow were monitored continuously.Results: The maximum amplitude of respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) during SDB was 2.1 times higher than during spontaneous breathing (Sfr) for both groups, maximising at 6 breaths. min−1 (0.25s ± 0.1 non-pregnant, 0.15s ± 0.1 pregnant). Although absolute RSA was significantly lower in pregnant women during spontaneous breathing (Sfr; 0.07s vs. 0.12s non-pregnant), SDB increased RSA to the same level as non-pregnant women’s spontaneous breathing levels. In both groups, the amplitude of blood pressure oscillations (both systolic and diastolic blood pressure) increased as breathing frequency declined, reaching a peak at 4 breaths. min−1 (4Ffr), which was up to 4.5 times higher (14.3%, 10 mmHg) than during spontaneous breathing (Sfr).Conclusion: Cardiovascular responses maximised at ≤6 breaths. min−1 and acute haemodynamic responses to SDB are similar in pregnant and non-pregnant women, despite absolute differences under spontaneous breathing conditions. If blood pressure oscillations underpin the anti-hypertensive effect of SDB, the data indicate that these can be amplified in pregnant women at frequencies between 4 and 6 breaths. min−1.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | blood pressure; network physiology; pregnancy; respiratory; respiratory sinus arrhythmia; slow and deep breathing |
| Group: | Faculty of Health, Environment & Medical Sciences |
| ID Code: | 42467 |
| Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
| Deposited On: | 23 Oct 2026 15:20 |
| Last Modified: | 23 Oct 2026 15:20 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
| Repository Staff Only - |
Tools
Tools