Xavier, R., Johnston, K., Patel, A., Watson, T. and Simmons, P., 2005. Using evaluation techniques and performance claims to demonstrate public relations impact: An Australian perspective. Public Relations Review, 31 (3), pp. 417-424.
This is the latest version of this eprint.
Full text available as:
|PDF (Research article) - Presentation|
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.05.006
Public relations professionals use many methods to demonstrate their contribution to organizational goals, yet it is unclear how their attitudes towards evaluation and the reporting of success matches real outcomes. Ten years after the International Public Relations Association produced an evaluation gold paper, this study combines research on Australian practitioners’ evaluation practices and attitudes, and data from industry awards to identify how practitioners demonstrate their accountability. Data suggest that despite the attention paid to evaluation by the academy and industry, practitioners still focus on measuring outputs, not outcomes to demonstrate performance and continue to rely heavily on media-based evaluation methods.
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||Evaluation, measurement, practitioners, public relations|
|Subjects:||Social Sciences > Communication, Cultural and Media Studies|
|Group:||Media School > Institute for Media and Communication Research|
|Deposited By:||Prof Tom Watson|
|Deposited On:||11 Sep 2009 09:38|
|Last Modified:||07 Mar 2013 15:14|
Available Versions of this Item
- Using evaluation techniques and performance claims to demonstrate public relations impact: An Australian perspective. (deposited 18 Dec 2008 16:46)
- Using evaluation techniques and performance claims to demonstrate public relations impact: An Australian perspective. (deposited 11 Sep 2009 09:38) [Currently Displayed]
Document DownloadsMore statistics for this item...
|Repository Staff Only -|
|BU Staff Only -|
|Help Guide -||Editing Your Items in BURO|