Hean, S., Warr, J. and Staddon, S., 2008. Challenges Facing Interprofessional Working at the Interface between the Court and Mental Health Services in the United Kingdom. In: International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services 8th Annual Conference: The Interface between Forensic and General Mental Health Services, 13-17 July 2008, Vienna, Austria.
Full text available as:
Microsoft PowerPoint
Vienna_Conference_presentation_new.ppt 1MB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Abstract
In the Criminal Justice system in England and Wales, Magistrates’ and Crown Courts wanting psychiatric opinion on a defendant, currently have to pay for that opinion from a psychiatrist working independently. If the psychiatric advice is not forthcoming or delayed defendants can wait unnecessarily long periods on remand in custody, failing to access mental health support and/or appropriate sentencing. This system can lead to tensions between the court and the mental health service providers. To address this, a local partnership between Mental Health services and the Criminal Justice system in the SW of England has developed a Service System Development Project. Part of this is the collection of baseline data to identify current challenges to the system from the perspectives of both the Court and Mental Health service personnel. This paper explores the latter, namely the Court’s perspective. As part of the baseline of a longitudinal survey design, questionnaires were sent to all legal advisors, lawyers, magistrates/judges and probation officers linked to courts participating in the project. Findings of the study revolved around their perceptions of the adequacy of current mental health advice provision and highlighted what they see as the strengths and limitations of the system. The paper concludes with a discussion of potential resolutions to the above tensions, exploring where these perceptions may be in conflict with those held by the mental health system and how these relate to the needs of the defendant themselves. As an audience, participants will learn of the: o Challenges facing interprofessional working at the interface between the UK Court and mental health services. o Potential conflict between two working cultures o Ways in which these may be resolved. As presenters, we will learn: o How these challenges can be compared and contrasted with the experiences of international colleagues.
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Paper) |
---|---|
Group: | Faculty of Health & Social Sciences |
ID Code: | 11981 |
Deposited By: | Dr Sarah Hean |
Deposited On: | 28 Oct 2009 07:16 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 13:26 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |