Hean, S., Craddock, D. and O'Halloran, C., 2008. The application and future of key learning theories in interprofessional education. In: 1st International Interprofessional Health and Social Care Conference, 1-2 July 2008, Mary Seacole Building, University of Salford, England.
Full text available as:
Microsoft PowerPoint
Salford_conference.ppt - Accepted Version 506kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Official URL: http://www.fhsc.salford.ac.uk/interprofessional/Co...
Abstract
IPE is no longer theory less. Many theories from a range of disciplines have been applied to the field, but with little apparent consensus on which theories have the greatest utility. This paper aims to contribute to the debate on the theoretical underpinnings of IPE by presenting a heuristic overview of contemporary learning theories and their current use in IPE. Following a brief description of a scoping exercise carried out to assess the current application of learning theories in IPE, the paper presents a map of the evolution and relationships between these theories as used in IPE. This will help researchers/ practitioners reflect on the theoretical perspectives they choose to underpin curriculum design and evaluation. It explores specifically the application of both behaviourist (e.g. interprofessional competencies) and constructivist approaches (e.g., stage theories) as well as those theories that focus on the context of learning such as socio-cultural learning and, at a macro level, activity theory and expansive learning It also pays particular attention to repositioning the ubiquitous, albeit superficially employed adult learning theories. The paper was presented to participants of a recent seminar series and their opinion on theoretical priorities recorded. These opinions are integrated into the conclusions of the paper where comparisons between learning theories are made. Theories are presented as a tool kit to be employed dependent on context and gaps in the literature, opportunities and priorities for future theoretical development are discussed.
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Paper) |
---|---|
Group: | Faculty of Health & Social Sciences |
ID Code: | 12057 |
Deposited By: | Dr Sarah Hean |
Deposited On: | 02 Nov 2009 19:55 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 13:26 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |