Redwood, S. and Todres, L., 2006. Exploring the ethical imagination: conversation as practice versus committee as gatekeeper. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7 (2), 38-45.
Full text available as:
|
PDF
Redwood_Output_2.pdf 153kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Official URL: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-06...
Abstract
This conversation (from which some excerpts are reproduced below) was part of the preparatory work for my (Sabi) doctorate in education in which I focus on ethical decision-making in qualitative research in health care settings. Les and I hope that readers who share our concerns about how qualitative studies are reviewed may contribute to this dialogue so that, as a community of researchers, we can start to think and speak differently about ethics and ethical decision-making in qualitative research. Thinking and speaking differently, we hope, may bring about changes in the review processes to make them more congruent with the values of our work and reflect more faithfully the tensions and dilemmas we, and our students, face in our practice.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1438-5627 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Ethics, qualitative research, research regulation, Gadamer, Levinas |
Group: | Faculty of Health & Social Sciences |
ID Code: | 1212 |
Deposited By: | INVALID USER |
Deposited On: | 04 Jan 2008 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 13:07 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |