Douglas, F., Gray, D. and van Teijlingen, E., 2010. Using a realist approach to evaluate smoking cessation interventions targeting pregnant women and young people. BMC Health Services Research, 10 (49).
Full text available as:
|PDF (open access journal) - Published Version|
Official URL: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/49
Background This paper describes a study protocol designed to evaluate a programme of smoking cessation interventions targeting pregnant women and young people living in urban and rural locations in Northeast Scotland. The study design was developed on so-called 'realist' evaluation principles, which are concerned with the implementation of interventions as well as their outcomes. Methods/design A two-phased study was designed based on the Theory of Change (TOC) using mixed methods to assess both process and outcome factors. The study was designed with input from the relevant stakeholders. The mixed-methods approach consists of semi-structured interviews with planners, service providers, service users and non-users. These qualitative interviews will be analysed using a thematic framework approach. The quantitative element of the study will include the analysis of routinely collected data and specific project monitoring data, such as data on service engagement, service use, quit rates and changes in smoking status. Discussion The process of involving key stakeholders was conducted using logic modelling and TOC tools. Engaging stakeholders, including those responsible for funding, developing and delivering, and those intended to benefit from interventions aimed at them, in their evaluation design, are considered by many to increase the validity and rigour of the subsequent evidence generated. This study is intended to determine not only the components and processes, but also the possible effectiveness of this set of health interventions, and contribute to the evidence base about smoking cessation interventions aimed at priority groups in Scotland. It is also anticipated that this study will contribute to the ongoing debate about the role and challenges of 'realist' evaluation approaches in general, and the utility of logic modelling and TOC approaches in particular, for evaluation of complex health interventions.
|Subjects:||Social Sciences > Sociology|
Technology > Medicine and Health
|Group:||School of Health and Social Care|
|Deposited By:||Prof Edwin van Teijlingen|
|Deposited On:||16 May 2010 15:12|
|Last Modified:||07 Mar 2013 15:28|
Downloads per month over past year
|Repository Staff Only -|