Johnson, A.J. and Miles, C., 2011. Order Effects of Ballot Position without Information-Induced Confirmatory Bias. British Politics, 6, 479 - 490 .
This is the latest version of this eprint.
Full text available as:
|
PDF
Johnson_and_Miles_%282011%29.docx.pdf 92kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1057/bp.2011.26
Abstract
Candidate list positions have been shown to influence decision making when voters have limited candidate information (e.g. Miller and Krosnick, 1998; Brockington, 2003). Here, a primacy advantage is observed due to a greater number of positive arguments generated for early list candidates (Krosnick, 1991). The present study examined list position effects when an absence of information precludes such a confirmatory bias heuristic. We report the first large scale low-information experimental election where candidate position is fully counterbalanced. Seven hundred and twenty participants voted in a mock election where the position of 6 fictitious and meaningless parties was counterbalanced across the electorate. Analysis by position revealed that significantly fewer votes were allocated to the terminal parties (Experiment 1). In addition, Experiment 1 reported preliminary evidence of an alphabetical bias (consistent with Bagley, 1966). However, this positional bias was not present in a methodological replication using six genuine UK political parties (Experiment 2). This suggests that in situations of pure guessing, the heuristic shifts from the primacy benefiting confirmatory bias to an alternative heuristic that prejudices the first and last parties. These findings suggest that whilst the UK general electoral process may be largely immune to positional prejudice, English local elections (in which there can be multiple candidates from the same party) and multiple preference ranking systems (Scottish Local Government and London Mayoral Elections) could be susceptible to both positional and alphabetical biases.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1746-918X |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | List position; ballot papers; voting; candidate selection |
Group: | Faculty of Science & Technology |
ID Code: | 20900 |
Deposited By: | Dr. Andrew J. Johnson |
Deposited On: | 29 Jul 2013 15:58 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 13:47 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Order Effects of Ballot Position without Information-Induced Confirmatory Bias. (deposited 19 Apr 2012 13:17)
- Order Effects of Ballot Position without Information-Induced Confirmatory Bias. (deposited 29 Jul 2013 15:58) [Currently Displayed]
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |