Skip to main content

Blended Feedback: Delivery of feedback as digital audio on a computer programming unit.

Atfield-Cutts, S. and Jeary, S., 2013. Blended Feedback: Delivery of feedback as digital audio on a computer programming unit. In: BCS Quality Specialist Group's Annual INSPIRE (International conference for Process Improvement, Research and Education)., 4--5 September 2013, London, UK..

Full text available as:

SQM2013Atfield-Cuttsand Jeary v10.0.pdf



Traditionally students are taught in a classroom, lecture theatre, or laboratory, by staff. They are encouraged to question, discuss, and participate in learning activities maximizing learning potential and to engage in dialogue as a means of monitoring understanding. Staff use a variety of technological aids to assist in the learning process and thus provide a blended learning approach (meanwhile offering a diverse student body greater opportunity to engage). However, feedback on assessments is still largely delivered as the written word even though academics and students believe that assessment provides notification of the quality of work. Students are thus treated as distance learners with no requirement to acknowledge receipt or understanding. They are given comments, which they are expected to interpret and action independently. Student engagement on a programming unit was previously improved by setting many small assignments throughout the academic year. Student attitudes towards this assessment style were positive as they began to realise the benefits of regular practice over time. However staff became aware that they were writing the same comments on work for the same students week after week, and students were not engaging with feedback. Hence this work begins to explore the use of audio feedback alongside the traditional written word to understand how blended feedback could assist in the comprehension of programming code to novice programmers. A pilot study is conducted as a first step with mixed results. Audio feedback was popular with students and 80% would prefer audio feedback in future although 60% felt that it would not improve their future learning.

Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Group:Faculty of Science & Technology
ID Code:20924
Deposited By: Symplectic RT2
Deposited On:07 Oct 2013 12:39
Last Modified:14 Mar 2022 13:47


Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...
Repository Staff Only -