RESPOND – A patient-centred programme to prevent secondary falls in older people presenting to the emergency department with a fall: Protocol for a mixed methods programme evaluation.

Morris, R., Brand, C., Hill, K.D., Ayton, D., Redfern, J., Nyman, S.R., Lowthian, J.A., Hil, A-M, Etherton-Beer, C.D., Flicker, L., Hunter, P. and Barker, A.L., 2014. RESPOND – A patient-centred programme to prevent secondary falls in older people presenting to the emergency department with a fall: Protocol for a mixed methods programme evaluation. Injury Prevention.

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF
0._RESPOND_program_evaluation_protocol_draft_V9_FINAL.docx-2.pdf - Submitted Version

478kB

DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041453

Abstract

Background Programme evaluations conducted alongside randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have potential to enhance understanding of trial outcomes. This paper describes a multi-level programme evaluation to be conducted alongside an RCT of a falls prevention programme (RESPOND). Objectives 1) To conduct a process evaluation in order to identify the degree of implementation fidelity and associated barriers and facilitators. 2) To evaluate the primary intended impact of the programme: participation in fall prevention strategies, and the factors influencing participation. 3) To identify the factors influencing RESPOND RCT outcomes: falls, fall injuries and ED re-presentations. Methods/ Design Five hundred and twenty eight community-dwelling adults aged 60–90 years presenting to two EDs with a fall will be recruited and randomly assigned to the intervention or standard care group. All RESPOND participants and RESPOND clinicians will be included in the evaluation. A mixed methods design will be used and a programme logic model will frame the evaluation. Data will be sourced from interviews, focus groups, questionnaires, clinician case notes, recruitment records, participant-completed calendars, hospital administrative datasets, and audio-recordings of intervention contacts. Quantitative data will be analysed via descriptive and inferential statistics and qualitative data will be interpreted using thematic analysis. Discussion The RESPOND programme evaluation will provide information about contextual and influencing factors related to the RCT outcomes. The results will assist researchers, clinicians, and policy makers to make decisions about future falls prevention interventions. Insights gained are likely to be transferable to preventive health programmes for a range of chronic conditions.

Item Type:Article
ISSN:1353-8047
Subjects:UNSPECIFIED
Group:Faculty of Science and Technology
ID Code:21554
Deposited By: Unnamed user with email symplectic@symplectic
Deposited On:21 Nov 2014 09:32
Last Modified:21 Apr 2015 13:07

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...
Repository Staff Only -