Tools
ToolsKlinkner, M. J., 2015. Is all Fair in Love and War Crimes Trials? Regulation 55 and the Katanga Case. International Criminal Law Review, 15, 396-410.
Full text available as:
|
PDF
Is_all_fair_in_love_and_war_crimes_trials_-_Regulation_55_and_the_Katanga_case.docx.pdf - Accepted Version 127kB | |
|
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1163/15718123-01502006
Abstract
The use of Regulation 55 and the recent Katanga judgment at the International Criminal Court have attracted criticism – not just from outside commentators but most notably from within the Chamber through the dissenting opinion of Judge Van den Wyngaert. This commentary reflects on the re-characterisation of charges in the Katanga case and the resultant judgment, in particular with reference to fair trial requirements. It argues that fundamental discrepancies between the judges’ interpretation of their fact-finding and truth-seeking remit exist and suggests that there is a need for coherent jurisprudence and clarification on the way the International Criminal Court tackles such essential disagreements.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1567-536X |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | International Criminal Court; ICC; Regulation 55; Article 69(3); fair trial requirements |
| Group: | Bournemouth University Business School |
| ID Code: | 21590 |
| Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
| Deposited On: | 08 Dec 2014 09:21 |
| Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 13:50 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
| Repository Staff Only - |