Wale, J., 2015. Commentary: Greater Glasgow Health Board v Doogan & Another [2014] UKSC 68. UK Health Care Law.
Full text available as:
|
PDF
Commentary__Greater_Glasgow_Health_Board%28final%29.pdf - Accepted Version 263kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Official URL: https://ukhealthcarelaw.wordpress.com/2015/01/20/c...
Abstract
This commentary considers the Supreme Court’s recent judgement in Greater Glasgow Health Board (Appellant) v Doogan & Another (Respondents) and the challenging issue of conscientious objection in the context of abortion.
Item Type: | Other |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Conscientious Objection |
Group: | Faculty of Media & Communication |
ID Code: | 21656 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 21 Jan 2015 09:41 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 13:50 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |