Tools
ToolsMacKenzie Bryers, H., van Teijlingen, E. and Pitchforth, E., 2014. Advocating mixed-methods approaches in health research. Nepal Journal of Epidemiology, 4 (5), 417 - 422.
Full text available as:
|
PDF (OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE)
Bryers et al 2015 NJE mixed meth.pdf - Published Version 879kB | |
|
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Abstract
This methods paper provides researchers in Nepal with a broad overview of the practical and philosophical aspects of mixed-methods research. The three authors have a wide-ranging expertise in planning and conducting mixed-methods studies. The paper outlines the different paradigms or philosophies underlying quantitative and qualitative methods and some of the on-going debates about mixed-methods. The paper further highlights a number of practical issues, such as (a) the particular mix and order of quantitative and qualitative methods; (b) the way of integrating methods from different philosophical stance; and (c) how to synthesise mixed-methods findings.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2091-0800 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Methodology ; iMulti-method approaches, ; Quantitative research; ; Qualitative research; |
| Group: | Faculty of Health & Social Sciences |
| ID Code: | 21677 |
| Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
| Deposited On: | 09 Feb 2015 11:59 |
| Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 13:50 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
| Repository Staff Only - |