Slattery, T., Sturt, P., Christianson, K., Yoshida, M. and Ferreira, F., 2013. Lingering misinterpretations of garden path sentences arise from competing syntactic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 69 (2), 104 - 120 .
Full text available as:
SlatteryetalJML3final.docx.pdf - Accepted Version
Recent work has suggested that readers 19 initial and incorrect interpretation of temporarily ambiguous ("garden path") sentences (e.g., Christianson, Hollingworth, Halliwell, & Ferreira, 2001) sometimes lingers even after attempts at reanalysis. These lingering effects have been attributed to incomplete reanalysis. In two eye tracking experiments, we distinguish between two types of incompleteness: the language comprehension system might not build a faithful syntactic structure, or it might not fully erase the structure built during an initial misparse. The first experiment used reflexive binding and the Gender Mismatch paradigm to show that a complete and faithful structure is built following processing of the garden-path. The second experiment used two-sentence texts to examine the extent to which the garden-path meaning from the first sentence interferes with reading of the second. Together, the results indicate that misinterpretation effects are attributable not to failure in building a proper structure, but rather to failure in cleaning up all remnants of earlier attempts to build that syntactic representation.
|Group:||Faculty of Science & Technology|
|Deposited By:||Unnamed user with email symplectic@symplectic|
|Deposited On:||13 Oct 2015 09:36|
|Last Modified:||13 Oct 2015 09:36|
Downloads per month over past year
|Repository Staff Only -|