Beyond synthesis: Augmenting systematic review procedures with practical principles to optimise impact and uptake in educational policy and practice.

Green, C., Buckley, S., Taylor, C. and Hean, S., 2016. Beyond synthesis: Augmenting systematic review procedures with practical principles to optimise impact and uptake in educational policy and practice. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 39 (3), pp. 329-344.

Full text available as:

[img] PDF
Beyond%20synthesis%20paper_final_anon_corrected.docx.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 12 August 2017.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

231kB

DOI: 10.1080/1743727X.2016.1146668

Abstract

Whilst systematic reviews, meta-analyses and other forms of synthesis are often constructed as sitting proudly atop the hierarchy of research evidence, their limited impact on educational policy and practice has been criticised. In this article, we analyse why systematic reviews do not benefit users of evidence more consistently and suggest how review teams can optimise the impact of their work. We introduce the Beyond Synthesis Impact Chain (BSIC), an integrated framework of practical strategies for enhancing the impact of systematic reviews. Focusing upon examples from health professions education, we propose that review teams can optimise the impact of their work by employing strategies that 1) focus on practical problems and mindful planning in collaboration with users; 2) ensure reviews are relevant and syntheses reflexively account for users’ needs; and 3) couch reports in terms that resonate with users’ needs and increase access through targeted and strategic dissemination. We argue that combining practical principles with robust and transparent procedures can purposefully account for impact, and foster the uptake of review evidence in educational policy and practice. For systematic review teams, this paper offers strategies for enhancing the practical utility and potential impact of systematic reviews and other forms of synthesis.

Item Type:Article
ISSN:1743-727X
Additional Information:Special Issue: SPECIAL ISSUE (PART 1): Is the Educational ‘What Works’ Agenda Working? Critical Methodological Developments
Subjects:UNSPECIFIED
Group:School of Health and Social Care
ID Code:22868
Deposited By: Unnamed user with email symplectic@symplectic
Deposited On:09 Nov 2015 12:19
Last Modified:27 Jul 2016 15:57

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...
Repository Staff Only -