More than just ticking a box...how patient and public involvement improved the research design and funding application for a project to evaluate a cycling intervention for hip osteoarthritis.

Andrews, L. M., Allen , H., Sheppard, Z., Baylis, G. and Wainwright, T., 2015. More than just ticking a box...how patient and public involvement improved the research design and funding application for a project to evaluate a cycling intervention for hip osteoarthritis. Research Involvement and Engagement, 1 (13).

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF (OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE)
Andrews et al (2015) - RIE CLEAT PPI Paper_for BURO.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

421kB

DOI: 10.1186/s40900-015-0013-8

Abstract

Background Involving patients and the public in research is an essential activity to ensure relevant, accessible, and appropriate research. There is increasing obligation from funding bodies on researchers to have well thought through plans for involving the public, and indeed it is often a condition for funding. Patient and public involvement activity in this project was conducted to inform a funding application to investigate the effectiveness of a cycling and education intervention in the treatment of hip osteoarthritis. Methods Six participants from a feasibility programme of the intervention attended a two-hour patient and public involvement consultation group to provide feedback on various aspects of the proposed research and intervention. During the consultation group, two independent facilitators followed a detailed plan formulated with the research team. Feedback was validated by the attendees via email following the consultation, and a report was issued to the research team. Further feedback on subsequent changes was sought via email and telephone with members of a Patient Advisory Group. Results The patient and public involvement consultation group provided invaluable feedback and suggestions which impacted on the design and quality of the research project and the intervention. Key changes to the intervention included extending the duration of the cycling programme from six to eight weeks, and inclusion of an exercise diary to promote adherence to the intervention. Key feedback regarding the design of the research and funding application included suggestions for methods of dissemination, and confirmation of the primary outcome measure. Conclusions Patient and public involvement was crucial to the design of the proposed research and intervention. It informed many aspects of the research design and made the funding application stronger as a result. Involving patients and the public in research is much more than an obligation, or ‘tick box’ exercise. It can change and improve research quality, which is crucial when answering questions that are meaningful and important to patients, and which leads to increased impact. Collaboration with patients and the public should be planned and reported from the conception of a research idea where the impact of such input can be considerable.

Item Type:Article
ISSN:2056-7529
Uncontrolled Keywords:PPI Patient and public involvement Impact Osteoarthritis Public engagement Cycling Exercise Funding application
Subjects:UNSPECIFIED
Group:School of Health and Social Care
ID Code:23006
Deposited By: Unnamed user with email symplectic@symplectic
Deposited On:14 Dec 2015 11:25
Last Modified:14 Dec 2015 11:25

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...
Repository Staff Only -