Newton, A., 2016. Biodiversity Risks of Adopting Resilience as a Policy Goal. Conservation Letters, 9 (5), 369-376.
Full text available as:
|
PDF (OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE)
Newton-2016-Conservation_Letters.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 141kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1111/conl.12227
Abstract
Resilience is increasingly being incorporated into environmental policy at national and global scales. Yet resilience is a contested concept, with a wide variety of definitions proposed in the scientific literature, and little consensus regarding how it should be measured. Consequently, adoption of resilience as a policy goal presents risks to biodiversity conservation, which are considered here in relation to three categories: (1) ambiguity, (2) measurement difficulty, and (3) misuse. While policy makers might welcome the ambiguity of resilience as a concept, as it provides flexibility and opportunities to build consensus, the lack of clear definitions hinders evaluation of policy effectiveness. Policy relating to resilience is unlikely to be evidence-based, as monitoring will be difficult to implement. Vague definitions also provide scope for misuse. This is illustrated by the case of European forests, where resilience is being used as a justification to promote management interventions that will negatively affect biodiversity. To address these risks, there is a need for standard definitions and measures of resilience to be developed for use in policy. Furthermore, there is a need for guidelines, standards, and identification of best practice in relation to resilience policy, to ensure that its implementation does not contribute to biodiversity loss.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1755-263X |
Group: | Faculty of Science & Technology |
ID Code: | 23317 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 22 Mar 2016 11:30 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 13:55 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |