Cuesta-Vargas, A.I. and Williams, J. M., 2014. Inertial sensor real-time feedback enhances the learning of cervical spine manipulation: a prospective study. BMC Medical Education, 14, 120.
Full text available as:
|
PDF
Inertial sensor real-time feedback enhances the learning of cervical spine manipulation: a prospective study.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 566kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cervical Spinal Manipulation (CSM) is considered a high-level skill of the central nervous system because it requires bimanual coordinated rhythmical movements therefore necessitating training to achieve proficiency. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of real-time feedback on the performance of CSM. METHODS: Six postgraduate physiotherapy students attending a training workshop on Cervical Spine Manipulation Technique (CSMT) using inertial sensor derived real-time feedback participated in this study. The key variables were pre-manipulative position, angular displacement of the thrust and angular velocity of the thrust. Differences between variables before and after training were investigated using t-tests. RESULTS: There were no significant differences after training for the pre-manipulative position (rotation p = 0.549; side bending p = 0.312) or for thrust displacement (rotation p = 0.247; side bending p = 0.314). Thrust angular velocity demonstrated a significant difference following training for rotation (pre-training mean (sd) 48.9°/s (35.1); post-training mean (sd) 96.9°/s (53.9); p = 0.027) but not for side bending (p = 0.521). CONCLUSION: Real-time feedback using an inertial sensor may be valuable in the development of specific manipulative skill. Future studies investigating manipulation could consider a randomized controlled trial using inertial sensor real time feedback compared to traditional training.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1472-6920 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Adult; Feedback; Female; Humans; Male; Manipulation, Spinal; Physical Therapy Specialty; Prospective Studies; Students |
Group: | Faculty of Health & Social Sciences |
ID Code: | 23351 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 24 Mar 2016 14:24 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 13:55 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |