Hanley, G. E., Munro, S., Greyson, D., Gross, M.M., Hundley, V., Spiby, H. and Janssen, P. A., 2016. Diagnosing onset of labor: a systematic review of definitions in the research literature. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16 (71).
Full text available as:
|
PDF
Hanley_etal_2016.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 935kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-0857-4
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of labor onset has been described as one of the most important judgments in maternity care. There is compelling evidence that the duration of both latent and active phase labor are clinically important and require consistent approaches to measurement. In order to measure the duration of labor phases systematically, we need standard definitions of their onset. We reviewed the literature to examine definitions of labor onset and the evidentiary basis provided for these definitions. METHODS: Five electronic databases were searched using predefined search terms. We included English, French and German language studies published between January 1978 and March 2014 defining the onset of latent labor and/or active labor in a population of healthy women with term births. Studies focusing exclusively on induced labor were excluded. RESULTS: We included 62 studies. Four 'types' of labor onset were defined: latent phase, active phase, first stage and unspecified. Labor onset was most commonly defined through the presence of regular painful contractions (71 % of studies) and/or some measure of cervical dilatation (68 % of studies). However, there was considerable discrepancy about what constituted onset of labor even within 'type' of labor onset. The majority of studies did not provide evidentiary support for their choice of definition of labor onset. CONCLUSIONS: There is little consensus regarding definitions of labor onset in the research literature. In order to avoid misdiagnosis of the onset of labor and identify departures from normal labor trajectories, a consistent and measurable definition of labor onset for each phase and stage is essential. In choosing standard definitions, the consequences of their use on rates of maternal and fetal morbidity must also be examined.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1471-2393 |
Group: | Faculty of Health & Social Sciences |
ID Code: | 23368 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 05 Apr 2016 10:22 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 13:55 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |