Hough, B., 2000. Conventions and Democracy. Anglo-American Law Review, 29 (3), 368-393.
Full text available as:
|
PDF
81.pdf 120kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Official URL: http://ibal.bmth.ac.uk/pdf_docs/81.pdf
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to consider how the introduction of a special Parliamentary select committee could extend democratic influences in the evolution of binding non-legal constitutional practices.1 Following a consideration of other possible avenues of reform, it will be suggested that whilst political actors should continue both to initiate new conventional practices, and to interpret and to adapt existing ones, an enhanced parliamentary engagement in the scrutiny of conventions would contribute to a more accountable government. There should be a systematic parliamentary participation in the debate surrounding the evolution and interpretation of conventions, which would require the executive to justify and explain constitutional change. A unique kind of select committee having special orders of reference is proposed to fulfil these purposes.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0308-6569 |
Additional Information: | Anglo-American Law Review, 368-393. |
Group: | Bournemouth University Business School |
ID Code: | 2900 |
Deposited By: | INVALID USER |
Deposited On: | 27 May 2007 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 13:08 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |