Tools
ToolsRowlands, S. and Ingham, R., 2017. Long-acting reversible contraception: conflicting perspectives of advocates and potential users. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 124 (10), 1474-1476.
Full text available as:
|
PDF
LARC Commentary v6 97-2004 no line nos .pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. 233kB | |
|
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Abstract
Worldwide, use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) has easily overtaken oral contraceptive use, now with double the prevalence.(1) Rates of LARC (defined as subdermal implants, intrauterine contraceptives and injectables) use are twice as high in the developing world as in the developed world.(1) There are many reasons for this increasing use of LARC, some to do with potential users and some to do with advocates of LARC.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1470-0328 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | LARC ; acceptability ; attitudes ; choice ; decision-making ; injectable contraception ; long-acting reversible contraception ; power ; preference ; promotion |
| Group: | Faculty of Health & Social Sciences |
| ID Code: | 29143 |
| Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
| Deposited On: | 11 May 2017 11:16 |
| Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 14:04 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
| Repository Staff Only - |