Does working memory training have to be adaptive?

Von Bastian, C. C. and Eschen, A., 2016. Does working memory training have to be adaptive? Psychological Research, 80 (2), 181 - 194.

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF
vonBastian.Eschen.2016.PsychRes.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

895kB

DOI: 10.1007/s00426-015-0655-z

Abstract

This study tested the common assumption that, to be most effective, working memory (WM) training should be adaptive (i.e., task difficulty is adjusted to individual performance). Indirect evidence for this assumption stems from studies comparing adaptive training to a condition in which tasks are practiced on the easiest level of difficulty only [cf. Klingberg (Trends Cogn Sci 14:317-324, 2010)], thereby, however, confounding adaptivity and exposure to varying task difficulty. For a more direct test of this hypothesis, we randomly assigned 130 young adults to one of the three WM training procedures (adaptive, randomized, or self-selected change in training task difficulty) or to an active control group. Despite large performance increases in the trained WM tasks, we observed neither transfer to untrained structurally dissimilar WM tasks nor far transfer to reasoning. Surprisingly, neither training nor transfer effects were modulated by training procedure, indicating that exposure to varying levels of task difficulty is sufficient for inducing training gains.

Item Type:Article
ISSN:0340-0727
Uncontrolled Keywords:Adult; Female; Humans; Learning; Male; Memory; Short-Term; Thinking; Transfer (Psychology); Young Adult
Group:Faculty of Science & Technology
ID Code:29211
Deposited By: Unnamed user with email symplectic@symplectic
Deposited On:16 May 2017 15:16
Last Modified:16 May 2017 15:16

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...
Repository Staff Only -