A comparative assessment of collaborative business process verification approaches.

Kasse, J.P., Xu, L. and de Vrieze, P. T., 2017. A comparative assessment of collaborative business process verification approaches. In: 18th IFIP Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises (PRO-VE 2017), 18 - 20 September 2017, Vicenza, Italy.

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF
PRO-VE 2017_paper 6.pdf - Accepted Version

279kB

Official URL: http://www.pro-ve.org/

Abstract

Industry 4.0 is a key strategic trend of the economy. Virtual factories are key building blocks for Industry 4.0 where product design processes, manufacturing processes and general collaborative business processes across factories and enterprises are integrated. In the context of EU H2020 FIRST (vF Interoperation suppoRting buSiness innovaTion) project, end users of vFs are not experts in business process modelling to guarantee correct collaborative business processes for realizing execution. To enable automatic execution of business processes, verification is an important step at the business process design stage to avoid errors at runtime. Research in business process model verification has yielded a plethora of approaches in form of languages and tools that are based on Petri nets family and temporal logic. However, no report specifically targets and presents a comparative assessment of these approaches based on criteria as one we propose. In this paper we present an assessment of the most common verification approaches based on their expressibility, flexibility, suitability and complexity. We also look at how big data impacts the business process verification approach in a data-rich world.

Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords:petri nets; temporal logic; collaborative business process; big data; virtual factory
Group:Faculty of Science & Technology
ID Code:29340
Deposited By: Unnamed user with email symplectic@symplectic
Deposited On:14 Jun 2017 14:47
Last Modified:25 Sep 2017 08:58

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...
Repository Staff Only -