Skip to main content

A fundamental conflict of care: nurses' accounts of balancing sleep with taking vital signs observations at night.

Hope, J., Recio-Saucedo, A., Fogg, C., Griffiths, P., Smith, G. B., Westwood, G. and Schmidt, P.E., 2018. A fundamental conflict of care: nurses' accounts of balancing sleep with taking vital signs observations at night. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27 (9-10), 1860-1871.

Full text available as:

[img] PDF
Hope et al. A Fundamental Conflict of Care.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Hope_et_al-2018-Journal_of_Clinical_Nursing (1).pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.


DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14234


AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore why adherence to vital signs observations scheduled by an Early Warning Score protocol reduces at night. BACKGROUND: Regular vital signs observations can reduce avoidable deterioration in hospital. Early Warning Score protocols set the frequency of these observations by the severity of a patient's condition. Vital signs observations are taken less frequently at night, even with an Early Warning Score in place, but no literature has explored why. DESIGN: A qualitative interpretative design informed this study. METHODS: Seventeen semi-structured interviews with nursing staff working on wards with varying levels of adherence to scheduled vital signs observations. A thematic analysis approach was used. RESULTS: At night, nursing teams found it difficult to balance the competing care goals of supporting sleep with taking vital signs observations. The night-time frequency of these observations was determined by clinical judgement, ward-level expectations of observation timing and the risk of disturbing other patients. Patients with COPD or dementia could be under-monitored while patients nearing the end of life could be over-monitored. CONCLUSION: In this study we found an Early Warning Score algorithm focused on deterioration prevention did not account for long-term management or palliative care trajectories. Nurses were therefore less inclined to wake such patients to take vital signs observations at night. However the perception of widespread exceptions and lack of evidence regarding optimum frequency risks delegitimising the Early Warning Score approach. This may pose a risk to patient safety, particularly patients with dementia or chronic conditions. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses should document exceptions and discuss these with the wider team. Hospitals should monitor why vital signs observations are missed at night, identify which groups are under-monitored and provide guidance on prioritising competing expectations. Early Warning Score protocols should take account of different care trajectories. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Item Type:Article
Additional Information:Funding Information The research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Wessex at Southampton University Hospital Foundation Trust. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.
Uncontrolled Keywords:Vital signs; adult nursing; clinical judgement; dementia care; guideline adherence; nursing care; palliative care ; qualitative study ; sleep disturbance
Group:Faculty of Health & Social Sciences
ID Code:30157
Deposited By: Symplectic RT2
Deposited On:03 Jan 2018 11:50
Last Modified:14 Mar 2022 14:08


Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...
Repository Staff Only -