Patient-reported outcome measures v. clinician-measured outcomes in community psychiatric practice.

Kodagalli, A., Mynors-Wallis, L., Cope, D., Ogallah, R. and Immins, T., 2012. Patient-reported outcome measures v. clinician-measured outcomes in community psychiatric practice. Psychiatric Bulletin, 36 (2), 61 - 64.

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF (OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE)
patientreported_outcome_measures_v_clinicianmeasured_outcomes_in_community_psychiatric_practice.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

112kB

DOI: 10.1192/pb.bp.110.032029

Abstract

Aims and method We examine the feasibility of the routine use of three patient-reported and one clinician-rated outcome measures (patient-identified problem, EuroQol-5D questionnaire, EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale and Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS)) in an out-patient community psychiatric service, and discuss the associations between these variables. Results The routine collection of outcome measures was feasible in the out-patient setting. There was a general improvement in the health status from the initial assessment to the first follow-up. Subsequent scores remained stable. Clinical implications The study encourages the practical use of scales in routine community psychiatric practice. As there was correlation between HoNOS and EQ-5D index, both need not be used in routine practice.

Item Type:Article
ISSN:0955-6036
Group:Faculty of Health & Social Sciences
ID Code:30974
Deposited By: Unnamed user with email symplectic@symplectic
Deposited On:10 Jul 2018 13:50
Last Modified:10 Jul 2018 13:50

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...
Repository Staff Only -