Drivers for coping with flood hazards: Beyond the analysis of single cases.

Abstract

Flood risks continue to pose serious threats to developing countries with dire ramifications for livelihoods. Yet, contemporary research on determinants for coping with flood hazards is driven mostly by individual cases with less effort to systematically identify coping strategies across multiple floods cases. This research analyses potential determinants of coping strategies to flooding across multiple floods using two case studies in Cameroon. Via empirical research, and qualitative/descriptive statistical analysis, the research investigated how human, social and economic/financial variables influence household coping decisions across the two flood sties. Results suggests a great influence of social and human capital on household decisions to adopt specific coping strategies, and that over 80% of flood victims in both study sites applied post-flood informal coping strategies. Analysis also shows significant inconsistencies with human capital variables, which reveal that coping determinants can be quite different even for floods occurring in the same agro-ecological zone. The findings also reveal that economic and financial capital has little influence on flood victims’ coping decisions, contrary to popular contentions in the literature. The results of this study have implications for research and policy implementation on flood-induced coping strategies in developing countries. Key words: coping strategies, determinants, flood hazards, multiple cases