Djalilov, K. and Radicic, D., 2019. The impact of technological and non-technological innovations on export intensity in SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 26 (4), 612-638.
Full text available as:
|
PDF
PDF__journal.PDF - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. 465kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1108/JSBED-08-2018-0259
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigates how both technological and non-technological innovations influence export intensity in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). In addition, we report results for each firm size category of micro, small and medium firms, and thus reflect SME heterogeneity. Design/methodology/approach: The research methodology is based on the analysis of the Eurobarometer 2014 dataset from 28 EU Member States, Switzerland and the United States covering the period 2011-2014. To statistically test the three defined research hypotheses on individual and joint effects of both types of innovation, a multiple treatment model was estimated. The advantage of this empirical strategy is that it takes into account endogeneity of both technological and non-technological innovations. Moreover, we employ the production approach or the direct test of complementarity between technological and non-technological innovations. Findings: Empirical findings indicate that technological innovations positively affect export intensity in small and medium firms, while non-technological innovations exert no influence on export intensity, regardless of the firm size. Moreover, the results from the direct test suggest no evidence of the complementary effects of technological and non-technological innovation on export intensity.Implications: We infer that SMEs would benefit more from public support targeting both exports and innovations than micro firms, as the sunk costs of exports are too high for the latter. However, public support aimed at reducing fixed costs of exports could be particularly beneficial for micro firms. Originality/value: The research fills a literature gap on the joint impact of technological and non-technological innovations on export intensity while taking into account endogeneity of innovation activities and SME heterogeneity.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1462-6004 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Technological and non-technological innovations; Innovation and exports; SMEs; Multiple treatment model |
Group: | Bournemouth University Business School |
ID Code: | 31529 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 07 Dec 2018 11:38 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 14:13 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |