Tools
ToolsChowdhury, M., 2019. Self and Peer Assessment of Group Work in Higher Education: A Game Theoretic Analysis. Review of Behavioral Economics, 6 (2), 147-158.
Full text available as:
|
PDF
Self&PeerAssessment.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. 190kB | |
|
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1561/105.00000104
Abstract
The paper demonstrates that the Self and Peer Assessment (SPA) method used in higher education, to map a group work mark to individual marks, can easily be modelled as a strategic form game. This modelling predicts students to report SPA following their dominant strategies. However, data of a real time SPA indicate that students may not report SPA by adopting dominant strategies. The findings are indicative of a mismatch between the game (SPA) designed by the tutor, and then played by students. The paper concludes that the interpretation of SPA is not possible, and statistics of SPA should not be relied upon to map a group mark to individual marks.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2326-6198 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Self and Peer Assessment; Dominant Strategy; Nash Equilibrium |
| Group: | Bournemouth University Business School |
| ID Code: | 31668 |
| Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
| Deposited On: | 22 Jan 2019 11:19 |
| Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 14:14 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
| Repository Staff Only - |