Weissberg-Benchell, J., Shapiro, J.B., Hood, K., Laffel, L.M., Naranjo, D., Miller, K. and Barnard, K., 2019. Assessing patient-reported outcomes for automated insulin delivery systems: the psychometric properties of the INSPIRE measures. Diabetic Medicine, 36 (5), 644 - 652.
Full text available as:
|
PDF (OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE)
Weissberg-Benchell_et_al-2019-Diabetic_Medicine.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. 142kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1111/dme.13930
Abstract
AIM: Participants in clinical trials assessing automated insulin delivery systems report perceived benefits and burdens that reflect their experiences and may predict their likelihood of uptake and continued use of this novel technology. Despite the importance of understanding their perspectives, there are no available validated and reliable measures assessing the psychosocial aspects of automated insulin delivery systems. The present study assesses the initial psychometric properties of the INSPIRE measures, which were developed for youth and adults with Type 1 diabetes, as well as parents and partners. METHODS: Data from 292 youth, 159 adults, 150 parents of youth and 149 partners of individuals recruited from the Type 1 Diabetes Exchange Registry were analysed. Participants completed INSPIRE questionnaires and measures of quality of life, fear of hypoglycaemia, diabetes distress, glucose monitoring satisfaction. Exploratory factor analysis assessed factor structures. Associations between INSPIRE scores and other measures, HbA1c , and technology use assessed concurrent and discriminant validity. RESULTS: Youth, adult, parent and partner measures assess positive expectancies of automated insulin delivery systems. Measures range from 17 to 22 items and are reliable (α = 0.95-0.97). Youth, adult and parent measures are unidimensional; the partner measure has a two-factor structure (perceptions of impact on partners versus the person with diabetes). Measures showed concurrent and discriminant validity. CONCLUSIONS: INSPIRE measures assessing the positive expectancies of automated insulin delivery systems for youth, adults, parents and partners have meaningful factor structures and are internally consistent. The developmentally sensitive INSPIRE measures offer added value as clinical trials test newer systems, systems become commercially available and clinicians initiate using these systems.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0742-3071 |
Additional Information: | Funding Information Leona and Harry Helmsley Charitable Trust |
Group: | Faculty of Health & Social Sciences |
ID Code: | 32209 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 29 Apr 2019 14:06 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 14:15 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |