Pagé, I., Swain, M., Wong, A., Breen, A. C., De Carvalho, D., Descarreaux, M., Funabashi, M. and Kawchuk, G., 2019. Correlations Between Individuals' Characteristics and Spinal Stiffness in Individuals With and Without Back Pain: A Combined Analysis of Multiple Data Sets. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 41 (9), 734 - 752.
Full text available as:
|
PDF
Page - Corrolations 2018.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. 2MB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.04.006
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the correlations between individual characteristics and spinal stiffness as measured with different spinal stiffness measurement devices in individuals with and without back pain. METHODS: A secondary analysis of 3 adult data sets obtained using 3 different devices, in 2 spinal regions, from a total of 5 separate cross-sectional studies was conducted. Differences in spinal stiffness between men and women and in the strength of correlations among spinal stiffness and age and anthropometric characteristics were evaluated using either the t test for independent samples, Pearson's correlation coefficient, or Kendall's τ rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: As expected, results varied between data sets; however, few factors had consistent correlations. Specifically, spinal stiffness was significantly lower in women than men in all 3 data sets. Height was positively correlated with spinal stiffness across all data sets. Although weight was correlated with thoracic stiffness, its correlation with lumbar stiffness varied. In 2 data sets, body mass index was inversely associated with lumbar spinal stiffness, whereas results from the thoracic spine region revealed a positive correlation. The results for 1 data set suggest that physiological measurement evaluating body weight distribution may also affect spinal stiffness; however, the specific correlation remains unclear. CONCLUSION: Despite data set differences, significant correlations were observed, indicating that participants' characteristics appear to affect spinal stiffness measurement.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0161-4754 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Association; Back Pain; Complementary Therapies; Spine |
Group: | Faculty of Health & Social Sciences |
ID Code: | 32241 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 07 May 2019 13:16 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 14:16 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |