Vasilev, M. R., Liversedge, S.P., Rowan, D., Kirkby, J. A. and Angele, B., 2019. Reading is disrupted by intelligible background speech: evidence from eye-tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45 (11), 1484-1512.
Full text available as:
|
PDF (©American Psychological Association 2019. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journaL)
Background_speech_HPP_revision2 (1).pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. 1MB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000680
Abstract
It is not well understood whether background speech affects the initial processing of words during reading or only the later processes of sentence integration. Additionally, it is not clear how eye-movements support text comprehension in the face of distraction by background speech and noise. In the present research, participants read single sentences (Experiment 1) and short paragraphs (Experiments 2-3) in four sound conditions: silence, speech-spectrum Gaussian noise, English speech (intelligible to participants), and Mandarin speech (unintelligible to participants). Intelligible speech did not affect the lexical access of words and had a limited effect on the first-pass fixations of words. However, it led to more regressions and more re-reading fixations compared to both unintelligible speech and silence. The results suggested that the distraction is mostly semantic in nature, and there was only limited evidence for a contribution of phonology. Finally, intelligible speech disrupted comprehension only when participants were prevented from re-reading previous words. These findings suggest that the semantic properties of irrelevant speech can disrupt the ongoing reading process, but that this disruption occurs in the post-lexical stages of reading when participants need to integrate words to form the sentence context and to construct a coherent discourse of the text.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0096-1523 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | reading ; eye-movements ; auditory distraction ; background speech ; noise |
Group: | Faculty of Science & Technology |
ID Code: | 32389 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 13 Jun 2019 15:06 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 14:16 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |