Meara, K., Pastore, F. and Webster, A., 2020. The gender pay gap in the US: a matching study. Journal of population economics, 33 (1), 271-305.
Full text available as:
|
PDF (OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE)
Meara2020_Article_TheGenderPayGapInTheUSAAMatchi.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 501kB | |
|
PDF
Meara Pastore Webster_edits revised AW.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. 616kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1007/s00148-019-00743-8
Abstract
This study examines the gender wage gap in the US using two separate cross-sections from the Current Population Survey (CPS). The extensive literature on this subject includes wage decompositions that divide the gender wage gap into “explained” and “unexplained” components. One of the problems with this approach is the heterogeneity of the sample data. In order to address the difficulties of comparing like with like this study uses a number of different matching techniques to obtain estimates of the gap. By controlling for a wide range of other influences, in effect, we estimate the direct effect of simply being female on wages. However, a number of other factors, such as parenthood, gender segregation, part-time working and unionization, contribute to the gender wage gap. This means that it is not just the core “like for like” comparison between male and female wages that matters, but also how gender wage differences interact with other influences. The literature has noted the existence of these interactions, but precise or systematic estimates of such effects remain scarce. The most innovative contribution of this study is to do that. Our findings imply that the idea of a single uniform gender pay gap is perhaps less useful than an understanding of how gender wages are shaped by multiple different forces.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0933-1433 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | gender wage gap; part-time work; gender segregation; unionization; sample selection bias; matching; inverse probability weighted regression adjustment estimator |
Group: | Bournemouth University Business School |
ID Code: | 32565 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 23 Jul 2019 13:10 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 14:17 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |