Chowdhury, M., 2020. Using the method of Normalisation for mapping group marks to individual marks: Some observations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45 (5), 643-650.
Full text available as:
|
PDF
Manuscript_NormalisationPeerAssessmentAccepted.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 201kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1686606
Abstract
The method of normalisation combined with peer ratings is utilised to provide the solution to the biased rating problem of mapping group work marks to individual marks. We critically evaluate the method of normalisation following the findings of an article of the author which argued against the use of self and/or peer rating mechanism. We demonstrate that the findings of that article also hold for the method of normalisation as the influence of human behavioural factors are not accommodated in the designs. Additionally, we argue that the method (and its variants) is rather complicated, where all possible contingencies are not pre-specified. It makes the arrangement between tutors and students in conducting peer assessments incomplete and unverifiable by a third party.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0260-2938 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Game theory; Peer Assessment; Normalisation; Group Work |
Group: | Bournemouth University Business School |
ID Code: | 32977 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 29 Oct 2019 15:29 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 14:18 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |